Are Drunk Driving Laws Too Strict?
New studies are published almost daily concerning worldwide drunk driving statistics and causes. With so much information available to law enforcement officers and politicians, it is no wonder that drunk driving laws are becoming more strict with each legislative session! The only way to fight these laws is to not drink more than one ounce of liquor per day or to simply not get behind the wheel of a motor vehicle if you’ve consumed any alcohol.
If you are caught driving drunk in some states such as Washington or Texas, you could lose your license for a predetermined amount of time, based on your toxicity level at the time of testing or arrest, or you could end up losing it altogether. The people that yield power in this arena are seriously concerned about drunk driving laws and want them to remain strict and even become stricter in the future. Since it is unlikely that Prohibition will ever be re-enacted, it’s something we all have to live with.
Drinking is a serious issue because it damages the body in so many ways and often affects people that do not even drink. Many states now require mandatory jail time for drunk drivers. It’s also become more difficult for repeat offenders to get “work permit” driver licenses as a result of DUI law enforcement practices and new strict drunk driving laws.
You could also lose your right to vote or own a weapon, and many states require that you pass a DUI school release exam before reinstating your lost license. Once you have been arrested for driving drunk, you will probably be required to take some sort of psychological assessment test before being allowed to even retain your license. And of course, your insurance costs will skyrocket.
More courts are awarding higher damages to those injured by drunk drivers, regardless of where they obtained the alcohol, and often include the alcohol provider in the lawsuit.
Many alcohol consumers feel that drunk driving laws are too strict, and try to cite studies that show there has been a reduction in fatalities in order to strengthen their case or minimize the damage they caused. It’s a losing battle though, because law enforcement agencies just don’t see it that way. The statistics show that the strict laws are keeping people safer. It’s not from drinkers being more responsible.
Business owners are at risk too. If your business serves alcohol by the drink you can take the first step in protecting yourself against lawsuits by having a coin-operated alcohol breath analyzer on the premises. Prevention is the best way to avoid potential litigation resulting from drunk drivers and your insurance company may even reduce your premiums.
See the state statistics and decide for yourself if drunk driving laws are too strict.
I definitely sympathize with the undeniable loss family’s have endured due to drunk driving, however, the laws approach individuals who made a single mistake as have the potential to harm someone as the same as harming someone. DUIs definitely should carry a penalty, and it should be a penalty aimed at education about the effects and impacts of drunk driving. It should not cause someone to fear for their job, their ability to live life freely, or trigger thoughts of depression and anxiety because they made a single mistake that they have proven through the course of their penalties, shown to learn and regret, and was not premeditated. This, of course, would not apply to those who caused physical or property damage.
The stats are very skewed and misleading as far as alcohol related accidents. The propaganda is also very bogus and misleading. For example,did you know that the BAC of 0.01 is used by the NHTSA to define an alcohol related accident. And that accident is then applied to the stats used for drunk driving? There’s a HUGE money grab going on here. M.A.D.D is making a fortune!! The ignition interlock mfg’s are now making a killing, which M.A.D. also has their hands in. The D.U.I laws are draconian,debilitating and destructive. It’s out of control.
Thank you!
DUI laws are all about the money made off of 0 tolerance laws.
Even little things like alcohol based sugers in soft drinks can make a breathalyzer show positive results leading to a DUI.
Madd and state driving schools are making a fortune.
This needs to stop.
How DO we make this stop? Why don’t they at least have a sliding scale? It seems obvious to me that someone who has had two beers that has not broken any traffic laws, totally in control of his vehicle, but gets busted by some dragnet DUI sting should not carry the same consequences as someone who is hammered and driving like a maniac. Maybe they don’t want the evidence showing how well people can drive over the almost zero legal limit. It’s not right to criminalize prudent adults for having a beer with friends and driving home (because they know they are perfectly able to do so). So what is the “mistake” they really made? Getting on a road with over zealous policeman who will throw you in jail at the drop of a hat where you land squarely in a corrupt system of judges and lawyers that want to penalize you to the max and bankrupt you so you can’t get out? It is sad that a country that calls itself free treats its citizens like such pieces of garbage.